UEFA is pushing for a more restrained use of VAR, with refereeing chief Roberto Rosetti arguing that video review should focus on clear and obvious mistakes rather than marginal incidents that require repeated slow-motion analysis.

UEFA says the referee on the pitch should remain the main decision-maker, with VAR acting as a safety net when something has clearly gone wrong. The aim is to avoid “re-refereeing” matches from the video room and reduce unnecessary interventions.

Supporters of this approach believe fewer reviews could mean shorter delays, more spontaneous celebrations and a return to VAR’s original purpose. Critics argue that, once the technology is available, officials should use it whenever it can help reach the correct decision, even in marginal situations.

The debate comes down to what VAR should be for: correcting only clear mistakes, or helping officials reach the most accurate decision possible.